Thursday, May 27, 2010

More Guns - Less Crime

“A compelling book with enough hard evidence that even politicians may have to stop and pay attention. More Guns, Less Crime is an exhaustive analysis of the effect of gun possession on crime rates.” Wall Street Journal    
“Lott’s pro-gun argument has to be examined on the merits, and its chief merit is lots of data. . . . If you still disagree with Lott, at least you will know what will be required to rebut a case that looks pretty near bulletproof.” Business Week    
 The long-awaited update to More Guns, Less Crime is out. This best-seller by John Lott first stirred up controversy back in the mid-nineties, shattered conventional wisdom and forced gun-control advocates to search high and low for evidence of blood in the streets. Almost overnight, the academic debate changed from criminologists and economists arguing over how much guns caused crime to how much gun ownership reduced crime.   
The original book helped convince many reluctant state politicians to give right-to-carry a chance. After all, if the blood-in-streets scenario would not happen, why not let citizens defend themselves? There are now only two states that do not allow citizens to carry concealed handguns whatsoever. Gun ownership and concealed handgun permits among regular, law-abiding citizens continues to increase, helping reduce crime and save lives.   
However, while there have been many positive developments on the state level and the sun setting of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban, some larger cities – most notably Chicago and Washington, D.C. – continue to impose their strict regulations that amount to virtually complete handgun bans. Internationally, the UN small arms treaty poses a real threat and countries have moved either to ban or strictly limit gun ownership.
This update of More Guns, Less Crime provides the first research that examines the effect of a range of gun laws. No where else has studied what happened to crime rates changed after the Federal Assault Weapons ban was sunset or after states have adopted the “stand your ground” laws, that don’t require that individuals retreat as far as possible before using a gun defensively.
More Guns, Less Crime responds to continued attacks on right-to-carry laws with up-to-date numbers how extremely law-abiding permit holders are as well as how these laws have reduced crime rates. If you want to know how permit issuance, the laws for getting permits, and gun ownership rates vary by state, this book has the facts. It provides detailed information on how everything from gun show regulations to gunlock laws to gun ownership rates by state. As usual, Lott thoroughly backs up his analysis with solid facts and rigorous analysis. His book provides the latest facts and arguments that let you show where gun-controllers get it wrong.  
Thanks to our friends at The Second Amendment Foundation for providing this book review. 

Saturday, May 22, 2010

'Most trusted man', Walter Cronkite, was named a Soviet target by the FBI

By Cliff Kincaid, Accuracy in Media

The late CBS Evening News anchorman Walter Cronkite is named in a just-released FBI document from 1986 as being targeted in a Soviet “active measures” campaign against President Reagan’s anti-communist foreign policy. Cronkite is named as a possible member of a U.S. delegation that would sign a pro-Soviet “People’s Peace Treaty.”

ShareThis
 
Cronkite, once known as “the most trusted man in television news” because of his influence during the time when three network news programs dominated the national dissemination of news and information, bears a great deal of responsibility for the American military defeat in Vietnam and the communist conquest of that Southeast Asian country. The term “active measures” in the FBI document carries special significance, since it designates Soviet intelligence operations to damage the United States and further the interest of Soviet foreign policy. The most common were political influence operations in which high-profile U.S. and Western political and public figures were used to promote Soviet objectives.












Released to this journalist through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the Cronkite documents include an FBI cover letter, dated June 25, 1986, which designates an attached internal memorandum from the “Campaign for a People’s Peace Treaty” as part of a “Soviet active measures” campaign. The document is addressed to the FBI director and the attention of the bureau’s intelligence division.While many questions remain about the nature of this secret influence operation and its ultimate success, the documents provide absolute confirmation that the Soviets were targeting major figures in the U.S. media. Other targets were talk-show host Phil Donahue, Harrison Salisbury of the New York Times, David Brinkley of ABC News and Bill Moyers of CBS News and later with public television.


The “Campaign for a People’s Peace Treaty” was a project of the Soviet front National Council of American-Soviet Friendship and was designed to create public and international pressure to undermine Reagan’s U.S. conventional and nuclear arms buildup. Assistant Director for Intelligence of the FBI Edward J. O’Malley testified before Congress in 1982 that the National Council of American-Soviet Friendship was founded in 1943 by the Communist Party USA and served Soviet interests. Cronkite, who retired as CBS Evening News anchorman in 1981 but continued to speak publicly about current events, was a natural target of the Soviets and their agents because he was already considered sympathetic to their cause. In 1979, he had given an interview to the Soviet magazine, Literary Gazette, and told Vitaly Kobysh that the “Soviet threat” was “most likely...a myth.” According to the magazine, Cronkite went on to say that “I will never believe in a ‘Soviet threat.’ Shortly after the interview was published, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan.
Donahue, who pioneered the daytime television talk-show format in the U.S. before Oprah Winfrey capitalized on it, had already been doing programs with Soviet journalist Vladimir Pozner and continues to be a prominent left-wing activist making occasional media appearances. His program on MSNBC was cancelled in 2003, his former senior producer Jeff Cohen claims, because he was too anti-war.

The FBI cover letter and memorandum can be seen on pages 58 and 59 in this collection of materials released under the FOIA. The FBI had previously informed me that Cronkite’s personal FBI file had been inexplicably destroyed by the bureau. Other claims made in the documents — that Cronkite assisted anti-Vietnam War protesters and said that CBS would rent a helicopter to transport Senator Edmund Muskie to an anti-war rally — have been seized upon by other news outlets which apparently got batches of the same material through separate FOIA requests. Pages 6-9 in the collection indicate that Cronkite was privately offering to provide a CBS News “open mike” to the organizers of the 1969 Moratorium to End the War in Vietnam. A 1969 staff study of the House Internal Security Subcommittee identified the organizers of the Vietnam Moratorium Committee as strongly influenced by the Communist Party USA.

The offer of support from Cronkite to the anti-war organizers is consistent with the fact that the CBS newsman had already declared that the communist 1968 Tet offensive was a defeat for the U.S. and that the American government should negotiate a military withdrawal. Cronkite’s verdict that the war was unwinnable — and its acceptance by other media and many members of the public — forced the transformation of U.S. policy into one of negotiations with the communists and eventual withdrawal of U.S. forces, leading to the Communist takeover of South Vietnam in 1975. Communist North Vietnam had launched an invasion of South Vietnam in 1960, creating the “National Liberation Front of South Vietnam,” or Viet Cong, as surrogates to wage war.

In the March-April 2010 issue of Military Review, in an article titled, “Lessons Learned from Vietnam,” Dr. William L. Stearman revisits the controversial period of 1968-1969, which was critical for the Vietnamese Communists because, despite Cronkite’s claims, they had actually been militarily defeated by U.S. and South Vietnamese troops during their Tet Offensive. Stearman notes that Cronkite’s hasty and faulty verdict on the war came after “a quick trip” to Vietnam in late February 1968. The Tet Offensive “was a major North Vietnamese blunder,” notes Uwe Siemon-Netto, an international journalist who covered the war. At Tet, he writes, Hanoi lost 45,000 men and its entire infrastructure in the south. “Yet major United States media outlets portrayed Tet as a defeat for their own side,” he said, referring to Cronkite and others. “Following Tet, [President] Johnson announced that he would not stand for re-election. Though a military victory for the United States and its allies, Tet ultimately marked the beginning of their defeat.”  Stearman concluded, “…thanks to U.S. media, the enemy won the war where it most counted – in the United States.”

The Soviet Communists, who were waging the same kind of propaganda war against U.S. policy makers and the public, were not as successful as the Vietnam Communists. Reagan not only persisted in his arms build-up and beat back communist aggression in Central America but launched several efforts to expose and combat Soviet propaganda operations. The Congress held hearings and published reports on such topics as “Soviet Active Measures” and “Soviet Covert Action,” emphasizing how Soviet intelligence operatives and their agents were operating on American soil and internationally. We now know, because of documents discovered and released after the Soviet collapse, that Senator Ted Kennedy made an offer to the Soviets to help organize opposition to Reagan’s pro-defense policies. Kennedy was the leading congressional sponsor of the “nuclear freeze” campaign to prevent deployment of U.S. nuclear weapons in Europe to counter the Soviet threat.

At Columbia University in 1983, a young Barack Obama wrote sympathetically about groups involved in the “nuclear freeze” campaign and the dangers of “militarism” but expressed the hope for total disarmament. As President, he is pursuing the goal of a world free of nuclear weapons, which many experts say is unverifiable, and just signed a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty with Russia that he wants ratified by the U.S Senate. Obama is opposed to modernization of the U.S. nuclear deterrent.

Cronkite and the other media personalities were included in a list of “possible members of the US delegation to sign the treaty.” A left-wing organization, the Center for Defense Information, is named as being in the position of providing a “military person” to sign the document. In the area of industry, a first name, “Armand,” is listed, an apparent reference to Armand Hammer, the late chairman of Occidental Petroleum who was a family friend of Al Gore and a Soviet agent. The “Labor “designation includes a reference to the ACTWU, the Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union. The memorandum says that Alan Thomson will take the signed “peace treaty” to Moscow and present it to the Soviet Peace Committee. Thomson was the executive director of the National Council of American-Soviet Friendship.

Despite his reputation as an honest and objective newsman, we noted in a column published shortly after his death that Cronkite was a key player in an on-the-air CBS News assault on the Reagan Administration’s defense buildup. We wrote, “After Ronald Reagan took office as President and proceeded to build up U.S. national defense capability, in the wake of the disastrous Jimmy Carter years, CBS News acted to counter the Reagan effort. They aired a five-part program, ‘The Defense of the United States,’ in which Cronkite appeared to tell us that the relationship with the Soviet Union was dominated by ‘the same old fears and doubts’ because we didn’t have a genuine dialogue with the Soviet communists.” AIM founder Reed Irvine noted at the time of the broadcast that CBS gave us “the Kremlin view that it is the United States, not the Soviet Union, that is striving for an impossible military superiority, while creating fantasies about Soviet aggression.” Irvine drew attention to the “persistent anti-defense bias of CBS News” under Cronkite and commented, “One has to wonder why the anti-defense bias is so strong and persistent at CBS. My own feeling is that it is a reflection of the views enunciated by Walter Cronkite that show a benign view of the Soviet Union.”

While Reagan pursued his arms buildup, including development of the Strategic Defense Initiative, and the Soviet Union eventually collapsed in 1991, the effort to save Vietnam from communism was not successful, thanks in large part to Cronkite’s influence. The bloody result: 58,260 U.S. servicemen and nearly one million civilians died in the Vietnam War. The South Vietnamese military lost about one quarter of a million dead, and over one million Communist soldiers were killed. Tens of thousands of South Vietnamese allies of the U.S. left behind after the American military withdrawal were tortured in communist camps. Thousands of others fled in leaky boats, becoming known as the “boat people.” The government of Vietnam today remains a Communist dictatorship.


Meanwhile, the National Council on American-Soviet Friendship turned its collection of pro-Soviet films over to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. “The films provide a fascinating window into a country and political system which no longer exist, and give viewers a way to see the Cold War from another perspective,” the academy says.

While the Soviet political system may not exist, the Russians have continued many of the old Soviet-style intelligence and influence operations. The book, Comrade J, based on the revelations of a Russian master spy, Sergei Tretyakov, identified former Clinton State Department official and now Brookings Institution head Talbott as a dupe of Russian intelligence. Talbott had been a columnist for Time magazine, where he wrote about the need for world government, a cause also embraced by Walter Cronkite.

Monday, May 17, 2010

China uproar over dead babies dumped near river

Do we need to reconsider our relationship with the Communist Chinese?

BEIJING
Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:24pm EDT


Related Video

Video

Wed, Mar 31 2010


An officer from the local health bureau carries dead babies found dumped in a river on the outskirts of Jining, Shandong province, March 30, 2010. REUTERS/Stringer
BEIJING (Reuters) - Chinese officials have sought to contain public outrage after workers at a hospital dumped 21 dead fetuses and infants' bodies near a river bank.

World  |  Health
The corpses were discovered near a bridge in Jining, a city in Shandong province on China's east coast, abandoned there by staff at a local hospital morgue, according to Chinese news reports that have stirred sharp public criticism.
Authorities have not said how the infants and fetuses died, but news reports said some of the fetuses had been aborted.
Police and medical investigators found that two morgue workers, Zhu Zhenyu and Wang Zhijun, had "privately struck oral agreements with the families of the deceased babies to dispose of their remains and had taken payments from them," the state-run Xinhua news agency said. The two have been detained.
The parents, apparently unable or reluctant to pay for proper burial or cremation, entrusted their dead to the two. Cremation in China can cost thousands of yuan (hundreds of dollars), depending on how elaborate the service.
"They took the corpses to near the Guangfu River and disposed off them. They failed to bury them properly, so that they were exposed to view and discovered," reported Xinhua.
For many ordinary Chinese, who often lament lax and increasingly expensive medical care, the dumping of the 21 dead fetuses and infants is indicative of deeper healthcare woes.
"This is shocking. It makes me wonder whether this is a civilized society," said one commentator on a Chinese-language Internet website.
One of the corpses was found by a local resident on Sunday. Alarmed residents then discovered more of the dead, including seven in the river, which is used for drinking water, said local news reports.
Some of the corpses still had green tags attacked to their legs, giving their birth date, mother's name and hospital bed number, the Beijing News reported, citing witnesses. One of the dead was in a plastic bag marked "medical refuse".
A deputy head of the Jining Medical University hospital, where the fetuses and infants died, was suspended, and two other hospital managers were sacked.
(Reporting by Chris Buckley; Editing by Ken Wills and Sanjeev Miglani)

Thursday, May 6, 2010

National Day of Prayer ruled unconstitutional by U.S. District Judge

KANSAS CITY, KAN.—U.S.
Congressman Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.), Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, National Day of Prayer Task Force Chairman and wife of Focus on the Family Founder Dr. James Dobson, Shirley Dobson and ACLJ Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow today called on Attorney General Eric Holder to appeal the ruling by U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb who ruled this week that the annual National Day of Prayer is unconstitutional. Tiahrt is introducing a congressional resolution condemning this ill-advised decision and supporting the continued recognition of the National Day of Prayer.

“The National Day of Prayer is a time when we as a nation acknowledge our deep reliance on God and ask for his guidance in these uncertain times,” said Tiahrt. “From the earliest days of our nation’s history, our Founding Fathers and presidents have called for days of prayer and fasting to be observed. Judge Crabb’s misguided ruling against a long-established tradition was characteristic of liberal judicial activism that has sought to remove God from the public square. Attorney General Holder should immediately appeal the Wisconsin court’s ruling that found the National Day of Prayer unconstitutional.”

Perkins said, “This ruling does violence both to the U.S. Constitution and to the deeply-held convictions of the great majority of Americans that turning to God for guidance and strength is a wise and good thing to do. The Declaration of Independence asserts that the reality of our Creator and His gift to us of ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’ is ’self-evident.’ Perhaps Judge Crabb needs to consider these truths that are the very foundation of our country. Judge Crabb is showing disdain for the principles of our founding, contempt for America’s heritage, disinterest in the views of the vast majority of Americans and disregard for the will of Congress. She should be ashamed and her ruling should quickly be reversed.”

Dobson said, “Since the days of our Founding Fathers, the government has protected and encouraged public prayer and other expressions of dependence on the Almighty. This is a concerted effort by a small but determined number of people who have tried to prohibit all references to the Creator in the public square, whether it be the Ten Commandments, the Pledge of Allegiance, or the simple act of corporate prayer – this is unconscionable for a free society.”

Sekulow said, “It is unfortunate that this court failed to understand that a day set aside for prayer for the country represents a time-honored tradition that embraces the First Amendment, not violates it.”

Tiahrt said, “Judge Crabb’s ruling was an offense to our constitutional rights and radically seeks to overturn more than two centuries of historic precedent rooted in Judeo-Christian values. Our Founding Fathers understood the absolute need for dependence upon God, and we are no less in need of his assistance today than when our country was founded. “In addition to an appeal of the ruling by the Justice Department, Congress should consider other actions to address the District Court’s ruling.”